Wednesday, 16 September 2026

Daodejing - Chapter Forty Nine

 


道德經  - 第四十九章

聖人無常心,以百姓心為心。

善者,吾善之;不善者,吾亦善之;德善。

信者,吾信之;不信者,吾亦信之;德信。

聖人在天下,歙歙為天下渾其心,

百姓皆注其耳目,聖人皆孩之。

Daodejing - Chapter Forty Nine

(The quality of indulgence)

The sage has no fixed mind [3] of his own; he makes the mind [4] of the people his mind.

To those who are good (to me) [5], I am good; and to those who are not good (to me), I am also good; - and thus (all) get to be good. [6]

To those who are sincere (with me), I am sincere; and to those who are not sincere (with me), I am also sincere; - and thus (all) get to be sincere. [7][8]

When the sage rules the world, they keep themselves quiet and non-judgmental, [9] merging and simplifying the mind for the sake of the world. [10]

The people all strain their ears and eyes, but the Sage treats them all like infants. [11] 

References

  1. The English translation is based on the translation by James Legge.
  2. The Chinese text is based on the Daodejing in the ctext.org website : https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing.
  3. No fixed mind (無常心 wu2 chang2 xin1) - It refers to a sage who transcends personal desires, prejudices, and stubborn subjective ideas, and does not impose his own likes and dislikes on others.
  4. Mind (心 xin1) refers to the people's desires, feelings, thinking and opinions.
  5. Good (善 shan4) refers to being good, virtuous, capable or excellent.
  6. Thus (all) get to be good (德善 de2 shan4) - means "so that everyone will return to goodness," or "this is true selfless goodness." Here “德” can mean “得”, which means obtain or gain.
  7. Sincere (信 xin4) - trustworthy, can be trusted.
  8. Thus (all) get to be sincere (德信 de2 xin4) - - means "so that everyone will return to trustworthiness," or "this is true selfless trustworthiness." Here “德” can mean “得”, which means obtain or gain.
  9. 歙歙 is pronounced as (xi4 xi4) in Mandarin and as (kap1 kap1) in Cantonese(讀音同「吸吸」或「給給」, 當表示「收斂、吸氣、融合」或用於疊字「歙歙」時,讀此音.  )   When the character 歙 is reduplicated in this sentence, it means "to take in, to integrate".  This first part of the sentence means the sage restraining their own desires, cleverness, and subjective biases.
  10. 渾其心 (Hún qí xīn): The word "渾" (hún) means "undifferentiated," "blended," or "purely simple," like a block of uncarved wood. Instead of imposing complex laws, sharp moral divisions, or clever schemes onto society, the Sage harmonizes their own mind with the collective mind of the people. This encourages everyone to let go of overthinking and deceit, returning to a state of natural innocence and peace.
  11. In a typical society, people are constantly on high alert. They sharpen their senses to look for advantages, watch what the government rewards, copy trends, and worry about what is safe or profitable. Their minds are hyper-stimulated and anxious.  The sage does not exploit this attention or feed their anxieties. Instead, through a calm, non-interfering presence, the sage helps the people relax their guard. The ruler guides everyone back to a state of a newborn infant (孩) —innocent, spontaneous, and free from calculated greed or malice.

Wednesday, 2 September 2026

Daodejing - Chapter Forty Eight

 



道德經  - 第四十八章

為學日益,為道日損。
損之又損,以至於無為。無為而無不為。
取天下常以無事,及其有事,不足以取天下。

Daodejing - Chapter Forty Eight

(Forgetting knowledge)

Those who devote themselves to learning, seek to gain something beneficial from day to day; 

Those who devote themselves to the Dao, seek to diminish something harmful from day to day.

They diminish it again and again, until they arrive at doing nothing (that is harmful and that is often based on human dao only).

Having arrived at this point of non-action (Wuwei), then there is nothing that they cannot do.

Successful leaders as a rule do not initiate unnecessary events. 

If they initiate unnecessary events, they are inadequate to be successful.


References

  1. The English translation is based on the translation by James Legge.
  2. The Chinese text is based on the Daodejing in the ctext.org website : https://ctext.org/dao-de-jing.

Wednesday, 19 August 2026

Philosophy of Lying

 


Tell all the truth but tell it slant, Emily Dickinson 

By LiveCanonPoetry on YouTube 


Please find notes on the Philosophy of Lying here.  This topic will be led by Maggie.


Tuesday, 28 July 2026

Daoism - an introduction

"Believing in Dào" - Chad Hansen 4-22-21 by Scripps College Humanities Institute

About the Speaker

Chad Hansen is Chair Professor of Chinese Philosophy, Emeritus at the University of Hong Kong. He has lived in Hong Kong off and on for almost three decades stretching back to the early 1960s. 

His research has focused on Chinese theory of language and logic (Language and Logic in Ancient China, 1983) and how the concepts used in understanding language and the 心 xīn heart-mind informed Classical Chinese ethical discourse (A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought, 1992), and led to a reassessment of Daoism (Laozi’s Tao Te Ching: The Art of Harmony, 2009). 

He is past president of the Australasian Society of Asian and Comparative Philosophy, former Chair of the board of the Faculty of Arts and of the Department of Philosophy at HKU. Before coming to the University of Hong Kong in 1991, he was Professor and University Scholar at the University of Vermont. 

Throughout his professional career, he has been invited to visiting positions at major universities around the world, including Stanford, UCLA, Michigan, Pittsburgh, Hawaii and the National University of Singapore.

Chad Hansen's Chinese Philosophy Pages


Daoism on Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Please see here: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/daoism/




 

Tuesday, 9 June 2026

What is Truth?

 

The Nature of Truth - Epistemology | WIRELESS PHILOSOPHY

In philosophy, defining truth isn't just about playing with words—it’s about figuring out how our thoughts and language connect to reality. Because "truth" is so fundamental, philosophers have spent centuries trying to pin it down, resulting in a few heavy-hitting core theories.


Here is a breakdown of the major ways philosophy defines truth.


1. Correspondence Theory (The Classic View)

This is the most intuitive theory for most people. It states that a statement is true if it corresponds to an actual fact or reality.

  • The Idea: If I say, "The cat is on the mat," my statement is only true if there is a physical cat, a physical mat, and the cat is currently sitting on it.

  • The Catch: It requires a stable, objective reality that we can accurately perceive. It gets tricky when we talk about abstract things like morality or mathematics. (Is "murder is wrong" true in the same way "the cat is on the mat" is?)

  • Can you think of other examples of where Correspondence Theory works well and examples of where the theory does not work well?


The following video gives a more detailed discussion of the theory:

The Correspondence Theory of Truth by Dr

Kane Baker

Please see class discussion notes here.

2. Coherence Theory (The Network View)

Coherence theory argues that a statement is true if it fits logically into a larger, pre-existing system of beliefs.

  • The Idea: Truth isn't about a single statement matching a physical object; it’s about how well that statement webs together with everything else we already know to be true. It's like a giant jigsaw puzzle.

  • The Catch: A system of beliefs can be perfectly logical and consistent internally, but still completely detached from reality. (For example, a highly detailed fictional universe like Harry Potter is coherent, but it isn't "true.")


The following video gives a more detailed discussion of the theory:

The Coherence Theory of Truth by Dr

Kane Baker

 Please see class discussion notes here.

3. Pragmatic Theory (The "What Works" View)

Championed by American philosophers like William James and Charles Sanders Peirce, pragmatism says that the truth of an idea is determined by its practical consequences.

  • The Idea: An idea is "true" if it works, if it is useful to believe, or if it successfully guides our actions in the real world. Truth is dynamic and tested by experience.

  • The Catch: Just because a belief is useful doesn't mean it's actually true. Believing you are invincible might give you the confidence to win a race, but it doesn't make you bulletproof.


The following video gives a more detailed discussion of the theory:

Pragmatic Theories of Truth by Dr

Kane Baker
https://youtu.be/uD3uRfDj_o4?si=y_BE41cTja2VMXjh
 

4. Deflationary Theories (The "Keep It Simple" View)

More modern philosophers argue that we over complicate things. Deflationism suggests that adding the words "is true" to a sentence doesn't actually add any new meaning.

  • The Idea: Saying "It is true that it is raining" means exactly the same thing as simply saying, "It is raining." In this view, "truth" isn't a mysterious property or a deep metaphysical concept—it's just a linguistic tool we use for emphasis or agreement.


The following video gives a more detailed discussion of the theory:
Deflationary Theories of Truth by Dr Kane Baker

Summary: A Quick Analogy

Imagine you are a detective trying to solve a case:

  • Correspondence: You look for physical fingerprints matching the suspect (direct evidence).

  • Coherence: You check if the suspect's alibi aligns perfectly with the timelines of all the witnesses.

  • Pragmatism: You follow the theory that successfully leads you to finding the missing money.

  • Deflationism: You evaluate each piece of evidence by stripping away the abstraction of "truth" and looking strictly at the base-level claim. For more information, see here.

Which of these theories makes the most intuitive sense to you, or is there a specific type of truth (like scientific or moral truth) you are trying to untangle?





Friday, 22 May 2026

Epistemology

 

Wireless Philosophy: PHILOSOPHY - Epistemology: Introduction to Theory of Knowledge

Introduction

The above video gives an introduction to Epistemology or the Theory of Knowledge.  

Epistemology is a complex area of study and involves many sub-areas including those listed in the following Wikipedia page - Outline of epistemology.

We can only cover a small part of this complex subject which I believe is most relevant to us.  This spreadsheet diagram shows the areas that I plan to discuss.


Analysis of knowledge

The following videos give some analyses of the concept of knowledge. 

Review Questions

  1. What are the three types of knowledge?
  2. What is the tripartite analysis of knowledge? Is it successful?
See answers here.

References

  1. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Epistemology.
  2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Epistemology. 
  3. Wikipedia -  Epistemology
  4. Wikipedia - Outline of epistemology

Thursday, 7 May 2026

Moral Philosophy / Ethics

 

Philosophy Bites - Janet Radcliffe Richards on What is Philosophy?

Janet Radcliffe Richards on What is Philosophy?

In term 1 on 18/3/26, Helen led a discussion on moral philosophy / ethics.  Please find below some notes on the subject prepared by Helen:

We will listen to the above podcast and have further discussion on this interesting topic. 

Debate | Legalising the Sale of Human Organs

The following Youtube playlist lists videos of a debate on Sale of Human Organs at the Oxford Union Society on Thursday 29th October 2015. The motion was: This House Would Legalise the Sale of Human Organs.


Speakers in order of appearance:

Callum Tipple | Proposition
Naomi Barker | Opposition
Janet Radcliffe Richards | Proposition
Vivienne Parry | Opposition
John Harris | Proposition
Raanan Gillon | Opposition 

This coming Wednesday, 20/5/26, I plan to watch some of the videos in this playlist and discuss the arguments made by both the proposing and the opposing sides.

Arguments of the debate

Please find below my summary of the arguments of the human organ debate:

Kidney trade in Iran

Iran currently is the only country in the world that allows the sale of one's kidney for compensation (typically a payment); consequently, the country does not have either a waiting list or a shortage of available organs.  For more information, please see below:

Organ trade - Wikipedia page

Please see below:



Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Zen aesthetics and Zen Buddhism philosophy






                            No photo description available.

Zen aesthetics are the sensory expression of Zen Buddhist philosophy, transforming abstract concepts of mindfulness, impermanence, and non-attachment into visual and experiential forms like wabi-sabi (beauty in Imperfection), tea ceremonies, and rock gardens. It emphasises simplicity, imperfection, and direct engagement with "suchness" (reality as it is), emphasising that everyday objects reveal deep spiritual truths. 

Core Philosophical Alignment: Zen Buddhism teaches that enlightenment is found in the present moment through direct experience rather than intellectualisation. Aesthetics reflect this through minimalist design (sumi-e (sumi means black ink, e means painting), Zen gardens) that removes distractions, fostering a direct, non-dualistic connection between the viewer and the art. 

Wabi-Sabi (wabi (subdued, austere beauty), sabi (rustic patina)): This is the heart of Zen aesthetics, directly stemming from the Buddhist concept of Anicca (impermanence). Wabi-sabi celebrates rustic simplicity, fragility, and the beauty of natural ageing (weathered materials, broken/repaired pottery), encouraging acceptance of the world as imperfect. 

Emptiness and Void: Zen philosophy emphasises "emptiness" (Mu), which is not nothingness, but the potential for all things to emerge. Aesthetics reflect this through the deliberate use of negative space (Ma), seen in sparse interiors and ink paintings, allowing the essence of a subject to emerge without being overwhelmed by clutter. 

Directness and Naturalness: Zen aesthetics value natural, unpretentious, and "honest" materials, reflecting the philosophy of being present and unattached. 

Examples in Practice:

Tea Ceremony: A choreographed, mindful interaction emphasising harmony and simplicity.

Rock Garden: A space for meditation, using stones and sand to represent a larger, abstract reality. 

Ultimately, Zen aesthetics allow one to encounter the fundamental truths of Zen Buddhism—impermanence, emptiness, and the beauty of the present—through visual or sensory experience. 

Class materials by Mr Victor Byrdy

We sincerely thank Mr. Victor Byrdy for giving two insightful presentations on Bonsai and Zen Philosophy to our PPPD class, which took place on 22 and 29 April 2026. 

Please find below some information provided by Victor.

The Power of Zen in Bonsai styling presentation:

Introduction to Mr Victor Byrdy and a brief description of Bonsai: 

The seven principles of Zen:

Zen Bonsai design: structural insights:

Some questions for discussion

  1. How does Zen aesthetics compare to Plato's aesthetics? 
  2. How do the Zen aesthetics and Bonsai art culture relate to and contrast with the western capitalism culture?
  3. Is Bonsai unnatural? 
  4. How do Bonsai art and Zen aesthetics relate to Japanese city and housing design and culture?
  5. As an art form,  how does Bonsai compare to other art forms like painting, sculpture, poetry, play, ballet etc.
  6. Bonsai is a Japanese traditional art.  Is art and tradition important?  If so, why?
  7. Can the art of Bonsai be educational?  Does the art have any practical benefit?
  8. Is the plant, being a living thing, a coauthor in the creative process? 

Further Information

1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Japanese Aesthetics:

2. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy



Wednesday, 11 February 2026

Branches of Philosophy

 

The Map of Philosophy - by Carneades.org

What are the branches of Philosophy?

The above Map of Philosophy picture is a screenshot of the YouTube video The Map of Philosophy - by Carneades.org: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxBShJU_CKs&list=PPSV

The Carneades.org YouTube channel has playlists of videos covering particular topics of philosophy:
https://www.youtube.com/@CarneadesOfCyrene/playlists


Philosophy page on Wikipedia

Let's have a look at the following Wikipedia pages:


Outline of Philosophy


Tuesday, 3 February 2026

Discussion topics - 2025

 

Term 1 discussion topics
ClassDatesDiscussion Topics
15/2/2025Introduction, Etiquete, political vs philosophical discussion
212/2/2025Political discussion and philosophical discussion, Penrose's three worlds
319/2/2025Introduction to philosophy - PPPD blog post
426/2/2025Logical reasoning - arguments
55/3/2025Logical reasoning - arguments
612/3/2025Logical reasoning - hidden assumptions, analogical arguments, components for strong arguments
719/3/2025Critical thinking - valid patterns, fallacies
826/3/2025Philosophy of friendship - Plato's Lysis
92/4/2025Philosophy of friendship - Plato's Lysis

Term 2 discussion topics
ClassDatesDiscussion Topics
123/4/2025Philosophy of friendship - Plato's Lysis
230/4/2025Philosophy of friendship - Plato's Lysis
37/5/2025Philosophy of friendship - Plato's Lysis
414/5/2025Meaning of life
521/5/2025Meaning of life
628/5/2025Meaning of life
74/6/2025Meaning of life - Explore possible answers
811/6/2025Meaning of life - Explore possible answers
918/6/2025Confucianism - the great learning
1025/6/2025Lunch at Blackburn Hotel


Term 3 discussion topics
ClassDatesDiscussion Topics
123/7/2025Confucianism - the great learning
230/7/2025Confucianism - the great learning
36/8/2025Confucianism - the great learning
413/8/2025Confucianism / Monty Hall paradox & other puzzles
520/8/2025Monty Hall paradox & other puzzles
627/8/2025Monty Hall paradox & other puzzles / Philosophy of politics and power
73/9/2025Philosophy of politics and power
810/9/2025Philosophy of politics and power
917/9/2025Philosophy of politics and power


Term 4 discussion topics
ClassDatesDiscussion Topics
18/10/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Machiavelli
215/10/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Machiavelli
322/10/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Machiavelli / Foucault
429/10/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Foucault
55/11/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Foucault
612/11/2025Philosophy of politics and power - Foucault
719/11/2025Philosophy of politics and power quiz, review of some 2025 topics

First class of 2026

Welcome all to the 

Philosophy Phor Phun Discussion class

of 2026 

1. Welcome

2. Emergency evacuation procedure

3. Medical emergency procedure

4. Get to know each other

5. The PPPD blog

6. Planned topics for term 1

7. What is Philosophy?




What is Philosophy? - First Lecture of the Semester - Prof. Jeffrey Kaplan

Some questions?

1. Prof. Kaplan (PK) claims in the video above (at 5:40) that the question "Does God exist?" is not a subjective question.  However, one can subjectively believe whether God exists or not.  Is PK correct?  Please see a possible answer here.


Wednesday, 15 October 2025

Machiavelli

POLITICAL THEORY - Niccolò Machiavelli by The School of Life

Some questions:

  1. The video above says: "We're often appalled by how sly and dishonest many politicians are, but we shouldn't be. In moods like this we need to remember and read the works of Niccolo Machiavelli." Do you agree?
  2. Helen asked whether there are any notable examples of countries where politicians who have adopted a Machiavellian approach achieved success. Her question suggests that such examples may not be immediately obvious. If political strategies based on Machiavellian principles are indeed effective, why then are these approaches not more widely adopted?  See answer from Bing co-pilot here.
  3. Why do politicians and leaders, in many countries, adopt a mostly ethical approach to their politics?

Machiavelli's 'The Prince': Summary & Analysis by Dr Aidan

Some questions

  1. What types of power were discussed in the videos above?  How are these powers used?
  2. For Machiavelli, the ends justify the means.  What limits how far such means can be applied?

Monday, 25 August 2025

The Philosophy of Politics and Power

 
1. Introduction: What is Political Philosophy? by YaleCourses

Political Philosophy

The above YouTube video provides an introduction to political philosophy.

Our discussion in class will be based mainly on chapter 4, The Philosophy of Politics and Power, of the book 'Philosophy for Busy People: Everything You Really Should Know' by Alain Stephen.  Please see the file via the link below:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Clo8yLxVRk6DRQKhv7Eq6wPQMkFWyYh/view?usp=sharing

Philosophy of Power

Chapter 2.5: Michel Foucault, Power by Leiden University - Faculty of Humanities

The above YouTube video gives an introduction to the Philosophy of Power.  

Chapter 4 from the above book discusses Foucault on Power and Knowledge.  I plan to discuss that in class as well.

Some Questions

Plato's Republic

  1. Plato/Socrates outlines a three part hierarchical structure of the human soul, which they believe is immortal.  The soul, as believed by Plato/Socrates, is equivalent to what we now consider to be the mind.  Do you think that the tripartite soul is an accurate depiction of the human mind?
  2. Should the choice of a political system be based on an assumed best way of managing the human mind, which is a biological system?  Is a society analogous to the human mind?

Foucault on Power and Knowledge

  1. In the above video, Dr Victor Gijsbers from Leiden University said in order to understand Foucault, he makes a distinction between two types of powers.  What are they?  Are there other types of power?  If so, why does Dr Gijsbers focus on these two types?
  2. Are there hierarchies of power in societies?  If so, how does that relate to Foucault's concept of power?
  3. According to Foucault, how does knowledge relate to power?
  4. Do you agree with Foucault that there are 'regimes of truth' and no absolute truth?

Friday, 15 August 2025

Monty Hall paradox and other puzzles


Monty Hall Problem - Numberphile


 Sleeping Beauty Paradox - Numberphile

Monty Hall paradox and other puzzles

Please find below the link to the PDF file of the document with the Monty Hall paradox and other puzzles.  This document is an extract from the book "There Are Two Errors in the the Title of This Book" page 90 - 96:

Thursday, 3 July 2025

The Great Learning - resources

 


What did Confucius want you to learn? The Great Learning 大學 Part 1

Overview of The Great Learning

Please find below the link of the PDF file of Overview of The Great Learning:


The text - Professor A. Charles Muller translation

Please find below the link of a PDF file of the A. Charles Muller translation of The Great Learning.


The James Legge translation on the Chinese Text Project website

Please find below the link to the Chinese Text Project web page with the James Legge translation. 
https://ctext.org/liji/da-xue


Translation in Chinese 

Chinese translation: 

My YouTube videos playlist on The Great Learning

2507 大學 the great learning


Sunday, 8 June 2025

Confucianism - Great learning

 
見賢思齊焉;見不賢而內自省也 - 論語, 里仁篇, 第十七章
When we see men of worth, we should think of equalling them;
when we see men of a contrary character, we should turn inwards and examine ourselves
-  The Analects, chapter 4.17.

Confucius

Confucius (孔子, Kǒngzǐ), born Kong Qiu (孔丘) 551 BCE in the state of Lu ( 魯, modern-day Shandong, China), was a profoundly influential Chinese philosopher, teacher, and political thinker during the Spring and Autumn period [1]. 

He is best known for founding Confucianism, a system of thought that emphasises moral integrity, social harmony, respect for elders, and the importance of education and ritual [2].

Rather than claiming to invent new ideas, Confucius saw himself as a transmitter of ancient wisdom. His teachings, preserved in the Analects, advocate for virtues like ren (仁 benevolence), yì (義 righteousness), li (禮 ritual propriety), and xiao (孝 filial piety), which he believed were essential for cultivating both personal character and just governance [3].

His legacy has shaped Chinese civilisation for over two millennia and continues to influence East Asian cultures and ethical thought around the world. 

References:



3. World History Encyclopedia - Confucius: https://www.worldhistory.org/Confucius/

Four Books and Five Classics

The Four Books and Five Classics are authoritative and important books associated with Confucianism, written before 300 BC. They are traditionally believed to have been either written, edited or commented by Confucius or one of his disciples. Starting in the Han dynasty, they became the core of the Chinese classics on which students were tested in the Imperial examination system.

The Four Books (四書; Sìshū) are Chinese classic texts illustrating the core value and belief systems in Confucianism. They were selected by intellectual Zhu Xi in the Song dynasty to serve as general introduction to Confucian thought, and they were, in the Ming and Qing dynasties, made the core of the official curriculum for the civil service examinations. 

The Four Books are:
  • Great Learning《大學》
  • Doctrine of the Mean 《中庸》
  • Analects《論語》
  • Mencius《孟子》

The Five Classics (五經; Wǔjīng) are five pre-Qin Chinese books that form part of the traditional Confucian canon. Several of the texts were already prominent by the Warring States period. Mencius, the leading Confucian scholar of the time, regarded the Spring and Autumn Annals as being equally important as the semi-legendary chronicles of earlier periods. During the Western Han dynasty, which adopted Confucianism as its official ideology, these texts became part of the state-sponsored curriculum. It was during this period that the texts first began to be considered together as a set collection, and to be called collectively the "Five Classics".

The Five Classics are:
  • Classic of Poetry《詩經》
  • Book of Documents《尚書》
  • Book of Rites《禮記》
  • I Ching (Book of Changes)《周易》
  • Spring and Autumn Annals《春秋》

References:


Great Learning

The Great Learning or Daxue was one of the "Four Books" in Confucianism attributed to one of Confucius' disciples, Zengzi. The Great Learning had come from a chapter in the Book of Rites which formed one of the Five Classics. It consists of a short main text of the teachings of Confucius transcribed by Zengzi and then ten commentary chapters supposedly written by Zengzi. 

The "Four Books" were selected by the neo-Confucian Zhu Xi during the Song dynasty as a foundational introduction to Confucianism. 

References:


The text - Professor A. Charles Muller translation

Please find below the link of a PDF file of the A. Charles Muller translation of The Great Learning.


The James Legge translation on the Chinese Text Project website

Please find below the link to the Chinese Text Project web page with the James Legge translation. 
https://ctext.org/liji/da-xue

Daodejing - Chapter Forty Nine

  道德經  - 第四十九章 聖人無常心,以百姓心為心。 善者,吾善之;不善者,吾亦善之;德善。 信者,吾信之;不信者,吾亦信之;德信。 聖人在天下,歙歙為天下渾其心, 百姓皆注其耳目,聖人皆孩之。 Daodejing - Chapter Forty Nine (The qual...