Wednesday 22 February 2023

Amazonian tribes and Rupert Spira - contribution from class member

 


Most of the class today were clearly aware of the Piraha tribe who have no numbers. I was not aware of these till now and the tribe I knew of were the Amondawa who have no concept of time.

Both Amazonian tribes evolved in isolation.

Both very interesting.

marian - 15/2/23


=========================================

This clip above from Rupert Spira sort of parallels our discussion today in class (about Zhuangzi Chapter 2 - Making all things equal) and is why I raised his name with Ken.

It is one way of viewing the this/that and what happens before/after that distinction.

marian - 22/2/23


=========================================

Ooops this has got me watching more Spira and this might be a more pertinent clip???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqOjFC9MCDc

marian - 24/2/23


Friday 3 February 2023

Guidelines for respectful, constructive, and inclusive philosophical discussion

Nicolas-André Monsiau, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons


The following guidelines are based on the Guidelines compiled by Professor David Chalmers: https://consc.net/guidelines/

I. Norms of respect

    1. Be nice.  Respect each others' cultural background, religions, beliefs and customs.
      2. Don’t interrupt.
        3. Don’t present objections as flat dismissals (leave open the possibility that there’s a response).
          4. Don’t be incredulous.
            5. Don’t roll your eyes, make faces, laugh at a participant.
              6. Don’t start side conversations parallel to the main discussion.
                7. Acknowledge your interlocutor’s insights.
                  8. Object to theses, don’t object to people.

                  9. Expect objections and disagreements.

                  10. Be forgiving.  People can make mistakes (especially the tutor).

                  II. Norms of constructiveness

                  1. Objections are fine, but it’s also always OK to be constructive, building on a speaker’s project or strengthening their position. Even objections can often be cast in a constructive way.

                  2. Even when an objection is destructive with respect to a position, it often helps to find a positive insight suggested by the objection.

                  3. If you find yourself thinking that the project is worthless and there is nothing to be learned from it, think twice before expressing your opinion.

                  4. It’s OK to question the presuppositions of a project or an area, but discussions in which these questions dominate can be unhelpful.

                  5. You don’t need to keep pressing the same objection (individually or collectively) until the speaker submits.

                  6. Remember that philosophy isn’t a zero-sum game. (Related version: philosophy isn’t Fight Club.)


                  III. Norms of inclusiveness:

                  1. Don’t dominate the discussion (partial exception for the speaker here!).

                  2. Try not to let your question (or your answer) run on forever.  

                  3. Raise one question at a time (follow-ups are OK, but questions on different topics go to the back of the queue).

                  4. Acknowledge points made by previous questioners.

                  5. It’s OK to ask a question that you think may be unsophisticated or uninformed.

                  6. Don’t use unnecessarily offensive examples.

                  Additional information: 


                  Critical Thinking Exercises

                    Some critical thinking exercises are available on the following: Philosophy Department, University of Hong Kong Critical Thinking Web http...